Home
|
NovaMind Home
|
Friends
|
0 New Messages
|
Profile
|
? Help
Login
|
Sign Up
Search:
Mind Maps
People
Subscribe
Signs
Fixtures and Chattels
>
Fixtures & Chattels
>
Diamond Neon 1976, BC CA
>
Facts & Issues
>
Map Branches
LaSalle 1969, BC CA
Facts & Issues
Carpet installed in hotel; now bankrupt
Was a "conditional sale"
Hotel financed with mortgage
Statutes set out priority of secured creditors
Which creditor gets the carpet?
Is it a "fixture"?
McFarlane J.A.
Degree
Slightly affixed by nails & staples
Presumed a fixture
Object
Factors
Plywood floors unsuitable
Carpet can't be loose
Floors need carpet
Replaced regularly
Used carpet market
Drafting Exercise
Draft a contract to sell this room, without chattels
Techniques
List specific inventories
Provide custom definitions
Use standard legal terms
Diamond Neon 1976, BC CA
Facts & Issues
Signs
Hanging from pole in concrete
Firmly attached to shack
Diamond leased signs to Uptown
Contract: "not a fixture"
W.C.P. leased land to Uptown
Uptown assigned land lease to Dueck
Diamond leased signs to Dueck
W.C.P. land lease to Dueck expired; sold land to T.D. Realty
T.D. Realty sold signs to Nettie Holdings
Diamond sued T.D. Realty for converstion
Who owned signs?
Robertson J.A. (majority)
Diamond's contracts with Uptown & Dueck don't matter
Degree/object show signs are fixtures
T.D. Realty bought fixtures with land; no conversion
Carrothers J.A. (dissenting)
Signs are unique (e.g. street address v. name plate)
Purchaser should've know these were chattels
Q: When did Diamond lose title?
A. When T.D. Realty sold the signs
B. When T.D. Realty detached the signs
C. When W.C.P. sold the land to T.D. Realty
D. When Dueck's lease of land expired
E. When Dueck's lease of sign expired
Clue: Doctrine of "tenants' fixtures"
Comments
►
0 branch comments of 0 total for this map and 0 for the whole document
You must be logged in to post comments