Home
|
NovaMind Home
|
Friends
|
0 New Messages
|
Profile
|
? Help
Login
|
Sign Up
Search:
Mind Maps
People
Subscribe
automatic
Paediatric Dysarthria
>
Scales and Assessments
>
quick & dirty!
>
Format
>
oral movements
>
Map Branches
adult designs
Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment
Enderby
Robertson Dysarthria Profile
disadvantages
possibly difficult to administer
affected by:
cognition
Attention
Language comprehension
age
important factor
Frenchay
12yrs-adult
uses?
Screening
Outcomes
Track progress
Objective data
Scales
Mathy 2000
Adult
Research orientated
Pennington and McConachie 2001
Best for PAEDS
Comm.  approach
quick & dirty!
apraxia profile
Hickman 1997
advantages
differential diagnosis
useful screening tool
Disadvantages
"ragbag"
rationale
Format
versions x2
preschool
School age
oral movements
automatic
Volitional
nonverbal
Verbal
levels
sounds
Word
phrases
Spontaneous speech
intelligibility
Children's Speech Intelligibility Measure
Wilcox and Morris 1997
advantages
intelligibility
contrast
Familiar listener
Unfamiliar listeners
Outcome
children c. functional
Disadvantages

audiotape only
comprehensibility 
expressive output
single words
connected speech
Format
adaptation:
adult:
aim
objective intelligibility
single word
systematic paediatric Ax
VMPAC
format
Speech characteristics
Connected speech and language control
Sequencing
Focal or remote control
global motor control
Disadvantages
cooperation
Attention
Language ability
cognitive ability
length
motivation
subjectivity
scoring
some items
American norms
advantages
Scoring
Training
clear
systematic
standardised
age range
3-12yrs
DEAP
Dodd 2002
format
4 subtests
OM ax 1/4
movements:
Diadochokinetic
sequenced
isolated
Disadvantages
subjective
OM ax
mouth focused
age 3;11-6;11yrs
limited
advantages
age 3;11-6;11yrs
Extensive norms
screening tool
Comments
►
0 branch comments of 0 total for this map and 0 for the whole document
You must be logged in to post comments