Nmc_header
Search:  Signup to RSS feed
 Subscribe
Share/Save/Bookmark

the rules of reciprocation - one of the most potent of the weapons of influence

Robert B Cialdini's Influence - Science and Practice>Influence Science and Practice Robert B. Cialdini 4th edition 2001 >Ch 2 Reciprocation>

Mind Map branch: the rules of reciprocation - one of the most potent of the weapons of influence Ch 2 Reciprocation the rules of reciprocation - one of the most potent of the weapons of influence One of the reasons reciprocation can be used so effectively as a device for gaining another's compliance is its power. The rule posses awesome strength, often producing a yes response to a request that, except for an existing feeling of indebtedness, would have normally been refused. - p. 22 Study by Dennis Regan in 1971 of participants offered a coke and then requested to purchase raffle tickets - offering of a coke (regardless if offer was "authorized" or self initiated) resulted in increased likely-hod of purchases and of significant increase in value of purchase, significantly more than value of coke. - Reciprocation rules enforces UNINVITED OR UNWANTED DEBTS This rule was developed as societies developed, promoting the development of reciprocal relationships between individuals so that one person could initiate such a relationship or action with out the fear of loss Marcel Mauss - French Anthropologist - describes the social pressures surrounding societal gift giving processes in human societies as having an obligation to give, to receive and to repay. "Although an obligation to repay constitutes the essence of the reciprocity rule, it is the obligation to receive that makes the rule so easy to exploit. An obligation to receive reduces our ability to choose those to whom we wish to be indebted and puts the power in the hands of others. p. 31 Reciprocation can trigger unequal exchanges Most of us find it highly disagreeable to be in a state of obligation. It weighs heavily on us and demands to be removed. because reciprocal arrangements are so vital in human social systems, we have been conditioned to feel uncomfortable when beholden. If we were to ignore the need to return another's initial favor, we would stop one reciprocal sequence dead and make it less likely that our benefactor would do such favors in the future. Neither event is in the best interests of society. Consequently, we are trained from childhood to chafe, emotionally, under the saddle of obligation.  For this reason, we may be willing to offer a favor greater than the initial offer in order to relieve ourselves of the psychological burden of dept. examples: White Christmas - wounded arm also important to note that the burden also appears to extend over time of the debt did not match or can be made to seem unequal to the initial offer. Second reason: a person violating the rule of  reciprocation may be ostracized or maligned by society. Other facets of reciprocation: Reciprocal Concessions a person who acts in a certain way towards us is entitled to a matching or similar mirroring or return action so, if a person makes a concession on a price, you are expected to match the concession in spirit or action. Rejection - then - retreat similar to a concession, initial request is purposely aggrandized but not overly, when target rejects offer, counter with "more reasonable" offer (the intended). p/38

Map Branches

Comments

0 branch comments of 0 total for this map and 0 for the whole document